The Conquests of Alexander the Great (334 bce-323 bce) As soon as Alexander formed an alliance with Taxila, Porus had begun assembling an impressive army to face the Macedonians in a large pitched battle. Ambi supported Alexander and Alexander gave Ambis lands to Porus. the Macedonians actually make Alexanders mind up to desist from venturing further East? The traitors put Darius in golden chains, hoping that by giving their king to Alexander they could obtain some political advantage. But Bessus and the other satraps stabbed Darius and left him dying in a cart. Bessus immediately proclaimed himself king of Persia, adopting the name of Artaxerxes V. In many ways, his self-proclaimed ascension was logical since the Satrap of Bactria was traditionally the Persian noble next in the line of succession to the Persian throne. As regards that influence of Greeks in North-Western India of the day, such influence occurs even if one country does not defeat the other. Following the battle, Porus became one of Alexanders satraps. The Kingdom of Taxila soon became an important ally for the Macedonians. Roman historians say, Porus was a small vassal. According to the Greeks, Alexander was apparently so impressed by Porus he gave back his kingdom plus the territories of king Ambhi of Taxila who had fought alongside the Macedonians. After almost a month of research on Alexander vs Porus, this is what I came up with. He took up his usual position on the extreme right with the Companions, the elite cavalry of his army. Elated at their success, Alexander sent a herald to shout the news to the enemys outposts to compel their surrender. Nonetheless, since I started writing answers on Quora around a year ago, I have discovered that there seems to be something of an obsession among Indian and Pakistani nationalists with proving that Alexander really lost and that the accepted narrative is a fabrication by the Greek historians who idolized Alexander. 3. I will give you a simple example of how roman hisorians manipulated facts. These men had gained a lot of experience in rock climbing from the previous sieges of the Central Asian campaign and were quite confident in the positive outcome of the delicate mission. The crossing did not go smoothly. At that point, Alexander intended to invade India. All weaponries came? Western Colonial historians implied that after the Battle at Hydaspes, India became a Greek colony, due to the the loss in that one battle! Fortunately, Alexander could count on the volunteers who had offered to climb over the escarpment in exchange for the reward promised by their king. It took place on the banks of the Hydaspes River in Punjab, as part of Alexander's Indian campaign. Or lost in translation combat with Porus instead of the defeat of Porus or the victory over Porus. If Alexander really lost the Battle of the Hydaspes as so many Indian and Pakistani nationalists claim, we have to seriously wonder how he managed to name two cities located so close to the site of the battle immediately afterwards. The army raised by Porus and deployed against Alexander included 200 elephants, 420 six-man chariots, 6,000 cavalrymen, and 30,000 infantrymen, according to the Greek historian Arrian. I am not a Muslim, but you cant call Muslims dumb, you can criticize or hate the religion of Islam, but not all of its followers are dumb, what about the Islamic Golden Age of learning in 700s ? Yep Raveesh, just ignore the fact there are no Indian sources on Porus. 2. Theres absolutely a case for Alexanders defeat by porus. So, madam you tell me, according to Greek historians, Alexanders Army fought bravely for 4 days to defeat a small feifdom. Alexander failed to catch up with Darius at Arbela, but the next year the Persian ruler would be dead, murdered by Bessus. The list goes on and India had the prime geography and structure to be a world power for 3 millennia. All in all, there are serious problems with the idea that Alexander could have just claimed victory despite having actually been defeated. Maam be practical, rely on your common sense. What is more, they were not inclined to face other Indian armies with elephants. Alexander vs Porus | Truth Uncovered | We have fooled for - YouTube They are all the same. His army marched south to join him and they began the long trek back to Babylon. Furthermore, even after the mutiny, Alexander did not just head straight back west; instead he headed south, conquering further lands as he went. A blatant victory does not explain that route but a truce or pyrrhic victory might . I study history and I know for three millennia Indian civilizations had the largest GDP by far. out a few words (of truth). You are judging the knowledge and comments of Vishal only on the basis of a mistake. Nandas had an enormous army at that time. As they marched to the Indus, they subjugated each village and city through which they passed. And this question about the authenticity of Alexanders and historys claims come from the WWIIs Marshall Zukovs speech at the military academy in India. Bessus, who was a prominent Persian satrap of Bactria, and who had proclaimed himself King after the defeat of the Persian army under Darius III, was killed in 329 BCE, thus . The Battle. In either situation its logical to be confused about the salutations for the other. Take a Visa to Pakistan when, Jhelum is flooding. 1. An entire genre of Greco-Buddhist art came to flourish in the region. This is a foolish support and 100% lie. This battle was Alexander's 4th and last campaign of conquest in Asia. This is. A Pakistan Senior Army officer serving there had mentioned, working here is tough. Why? The ground shook with each step the great lumbering war elephants took as they advanced toward the wide-eyed Greeks. For instance, Ptolemaios I Soter and Nearchos, two of Alexander the Greats generals who outlived him, both wrote accounts of his conquests, which would have included the Battle of the Hydaspes. The elephants, maddened by the harassing attacks against their flanks and legs, then began to rampage through the dense ranks of Indian infantry as they sought to escape. In the months that followed the Battle of Gaugamela fought on October 1, 331 BC, King Darius III found temporary refuge in the satrapies of Bactria and Sogdia, which were ruled by the pow- erful governor Bessus. Vishal is saying right bro, except stating Alexander as Roman.. Kings and nobles, fighting on elephants or chariots, were armed with javelins or spears and protected by brass helmets and scale armor. So, please stop this nationalist shit and stop pretending that people from your land never lost to invaders. It was Amar who shot Alex not Porus. Meanwhile, some of the earliest known statues of the Buddha display him in a heavily Greek-influenced fashion. Over time, the wounds Alexanders tenacious foot soldiers inflicted on the elephants caused them to turn around and head for the rear. But his soldiers were exhausted from the extended campaigns and the numerous hardships they had endured. Then how can you blame us. The Macedonians marched swiftly along the Cophen River. Generally historians (mostly western) have put forward the thesis that Alexander defeated Porus and then as a mark of magnanimity gifted vast lands to Porus. Alexander deployed his infantry phalanxes in the center with a protective screen of mounted archers and light cavalrymen in front of them. As a result, Indian military units, most of which were archers, had participated in the Persian campaigns against Greece. We cant just put a conclusion. If Alexander had really lost the battle, then the tens of thousands of people who survived the battle would have all known that he was lying when he claimed victory over Porus. Alex didnt realise that too. So my dear friend, if you think Alexander conquered the entire earth and became the king of the world, you and your western historians can say it. Is it plausible to believe Porus beat Alexander? - Quora by Angel . Did Alexander successfully defeat Porus/Paurava at the Battle of Hydaspes? So WHY would he give the Kingdom he won BACK to Puru? So what you say is logical could well be based upon incorrect premises. Battle of Hydaspes. There is a trend going out in India where the nationalists are trying to tell the world that their ancient ancestors had knowledge of everything.. You wont know, when you will go to lords path. Quaero Sophisma: Alexander the Defeated - Blogger Everyone would know that anyone on war foot would never stop at one place for more that couple of weeks, that too if there is a reason. Porus did not rule India. On: July 7, 2022 Asked by: Leone Murphy Advertisement The battle resulted in a Greek victory and the surrender of Porus. Even the present time, Jhelum is around almost 800-1km wide. They resolved to use catapults and archers in battle and to capture enemy strongpoints by siege even though they knew that this would be a time-consuming process. AnswerNo. People generally only tend to acknowledge their enemies courage after they have been defeated. Taxila was an important ally both because of its location adjacent to India and because it had a large population that could furnish a substantial number of allied troops. For secondary weapons the Pauravan warriors of Alexanders time used swords, maces, and clubs. Even if we leave aside how incredibly implausible this whole idea that Alexander somehow managed to pass off a total defeat as a total victory is, there is still another problem, which is that, quite frankly, the story as we have it does not exactly make the best pro-Alexander propaganda and it is not the kind of story we would expect Alexander to have made up if he were going to make a story up. The western accounts of the battles state that Alexander the Great won against Porus' armies, and then, once Porus amounted a larger one, a great deal of the Greek forces mutinied, and then Alexander the Great retired his conquest and returned to Babylonia. Calling someone Nationalist, leftist, rightist whatever ist. The same feelings of fear and terror also were present within the army of King Porus of Paurava. Though Roman historians say it was porus who shot arrow at Alex. Youd agree by all the cited accounts it appears a very pyrrhic victory for Alexander. Alexander ordered his archers, light infantry, and light cavalry to counterattack. Maam, This link from wikipedia says that "After victory, Alexander made an alliance with Porus and appointed him as satrap of his own kingdom". So the chances are higher that there was a truce or very very pyrrhic victory. To deceive his opponent, Alexander built numerous campfires along his side of the river, marching his men back and forth in formation; meanwhile, his scouts searched for the best possible crossing spot. Ambhi chose not to fight Alex or say surrendered because Taxila university was priority for him too. Alexander was referred to as "great" by early historians just as several other conquerors and prominent rulers have been called across empires and ages. Uc Berkeley Move Out Day 2023, Dunwoody Senior Baseball Schedule, Articles A
" />

alexander was defeated by porus

alexander was defeated by porus

He had fought in dozens of battles and skirmishes and been wounded many times, but he had always won. The other major sources for Alexanders campaigns are the Universal History by the Greek historian Diodoros Sikeliotes (lived c. 90 c. 30 BC), the Historiae Alexandri Magni by the Roman historian Quintus Curtius Rufus (lived c. first century AD), the Life of Alexander the Great by the Greek biographer Ploutarchos of Chaironeia (lived c. 46 c. 120 AD), and the Epitome of the Philippic History of Pompeius Trogus by the Roman historian Marcus Iunianus Iustinus Frontinus (lived c. second century AD). Anyone in the world can have their lucky day - including Alexander! I think there is little doubt that the unexpected difficulties Alexanders army encountered in the Battle of the Hydaspes against Poruss army played an important role in their decision to mutiny. One of the most beautiful empires in the world. Next, Alexander led his army toward the Indian camp. 1. A number of them have survived to the present day. It would be a battle that would shock Alexander, his army, and the entire Macedonian Empire. Porus relied heavily on the Hydaspes, which at that time of year was swollen by monsoon rains and the melting snows of the Himalayas, to delay the Macedonian advance. As a ploy, Alexander ordered large shipments of food and supplies from his allies in Taxila. There is no way in which this story could possibly reflect poorly on Porus. He and his downtrodden troops literally begged and ran for their lives managing to flee by ship to persia via the sindh route. In accordance with their kings orders, they signalled their success to the troops below by waving pieces of cloth. In 326 BC, Alexander defeated Porus and the Pauravas during the Battle of the Hydaspes, [1] [2] but that engagement was possibly their Macedonians' most costly battle. Alexander, full of admiration for Porus, approached the defeated king with the intention of saving his life. Alexander, excited at the prospect of conquering an exotic land such as India, had no intention of stopping. 8. In 329 BC, the Macedonian army entered Bactria by way of the Hindu Kush mountain range, which had been left undefended by Bessus. One point is very sure, western people who think they are the greatest do not like to agree that there was another great civilization towards their eastern side other than Greeks and Romans, Which is the saddest part in todays era. Thats a personal opinion. Arrian says he had 6,000 foot soldiers and 5,000 horsemen. 1. The Conquests of Alexander the Great (334 bce-323 bce) As soon as Alexander formed an alliance with Taxila, Porus had begun assembling an impressive army to face the Macedonians in a large pitched battle. Ambi supported Alexander and Alexander gave Ambis lands to Porus. the Macedonians actually make Alexanders mind up to desist from venturing further East? The traitors put Darius in golden chains, hoping that by giving their king to Alexander they could obtain some political advantage. But Bessus and the other satraps stabbed Darius and left him dying in a cart. Bessus immediately proclaimed himself king of Persia, adopting the name of Artaxerxes V. In many ways, his self-proclaimed ascension was logical since the Satrap of Bactria was traditionally the Persian noble next in the line of succession to the Persian throne. As regards that influence of Greeks in North-Western India of the day, such influence occurs even if one country does not defeat the other. Following the battle, Porus became one of Alexanders satraps. The Kingdom of Taxila soon became an important ally for the Macedonians. Roman historians say, Porus was a small vassal. According to the Greeks, Alexander was apparently so impressed by Porus he gave back his kingdom plus the territories of king Ambhi of Taxila who had fought alongside the Macedonians. After almost a month of research on Alexander vs Porus, this is what I came up with. He took up his usual position on the extreme right with the Companions, the elite cavalry of his army. Elated at their success, Alexander sent a herald to shout the news to the enemys outposts to compel their surrender. Nonetheless, since I started writing answers on Quora around a year ago, I have discovered that there seems to be something of an obsession among Indian and Pakistani nationalists with proving that Alexander really lost and that the accepted narrative is a fabrication by the Greek historians who idolized Alexander. 3. I will give you a simple example of how roman hisorians manipulated facts. These men had gained a lot of experience in rock climbing from the previous sieges of the Central Asian campaign and were quite confident in the positive outcome of the delicate mission. The crossing did not go smoothly. At that point, Alexander intended to invade India. All weaponries came? Western Colonial historians implied that after the Battle at Hydaspes, India became a Greek colony, due to the the loss in that one battle! Fortunately, Alexander could count on the volunteers who had offered to climb over the escarpment in exchange for the reward promised by their king. It took place on the banks of the Hydaspes River in Punjab, as part of Alexander's Indian campaign. Or lost in translation combat with Porus instead of the defeat of Porus or the victory over Porus. If Alexander really lost the Battle of the Hydaspes as so many Indian and Pakistani nationalists claim, we have to seriously wonder how he managed to name two cities located so close to the site of the battle immediately afterwards. The army raised by Porus and deployed against Alexander included 200 elephants, 420 six-man chariots, 6,000 cavalrymen, and 30,000 infantrymen, according to the Greek historian Arrian. I am not a Muslim, but you cant call Muslims dumb, you can criticize or hate the religion of Islam, but not all of its followers are dumb, what about the Islamic Golden Age of learning in 700s ? Yep Raveesh, just ignore the fact there are no Indian sources on Porus. 2. Theres absolutely a case for Alexanders defeat by porus. So, madam you tell me, according to Greek historians, Alexanders Army fought bravely for 4 days to defeat a small feifdom. Alexander failed to catch up with Darius at Arbela, but the next year the Persian ruler would be dead, murdered by Bessus. The list goes on and India had the prime geography and structure to be a world power for 3 millennia. All in all, there are serious problems with the idea that Alexander could have just claimed victory despite having actually been defeated. Maam be practical, rely on your common sense. What is more, they were not inclined to face other Indian armies with elephants. Alexander vs Porus | Truth Uncovered | We have fooled for - YouTube They are all the same. His army marched south to join him and they began the long trek back to Babylon. Furthermore, even after the mutiny, Alexander did not just head straight back west; instead he headed south, conquering further lands as he went. A blatant victory does not explain that route but a truce or pyrrhic victory might . I study history and I know for three millennia Indian civilizations had the largest GDP by far. out a few words (of truth). You are judging the knowledge and comments of Vishal only on the basis of a mistake. Nandas had an enormous army at that time. As they marched to the Indus, they subjugated each village and city through which they passed. And this question about the authenticity of Alexanders and historys claims come from the WWIIs Marshall Zukovs speech at the military academy in India. Bessus, who was a prominent Persian satrap of Bactria, and who had proclaimed himself King after the defeat of the Persian army under Darius III, was killed in 329 BCE, thus . The Battle. In either situation its logical to be confused about the salutations for the other. Take a Visa to Pakistan when, Jhelum is flooding. 1. An entire genre of Greco-Buddhist art came to flourish in the region. This is a foolish support and 100% lie. This battle was Alexander's 4th and last campaign of conquest in Asia. This is. A Pakistan Senior Army officer serving there had mentioned, working here is tough. Why? The ground shook with each step the great lumbering war elephants took as they advanced toward the wide-eyed Greeks. For instance, Ptolemaios I Soter and Nearchos, two of Alexander the Greats generals who outlived him, both wrote accounts of his conquests, which would have included the Battle of the Hydaspes. The elephants, maddened by the harassing attacks against their flanks and legs, then began to rampage through the dense ranks of Indian infantry as they sought to escape. In the months that followed the Battle of Gaugamela fought on October 1, 331 BC, King Darius III found temporary refuge in the satrapies of Bactria and Sogdia, which were ruled by the pow- erful governor Bessus. Vishal is saying right bro, except stating Alexander as Roman.. Kings and nobles, fighting on elephants or chariots, were armed with javelins or spears and protected by brass helmets and scale armor. So, please stop this nationalist shit and stop pretending that people from your land never lost to invaders. It was Amar who shot Alex not Porus. Meanwhile, some of the earliest known statues of the Buddha display him in a heavily Greek-influenced fashion. Over time, the wounds Alexanders tenacious foot soldiers inflicted on the elephants caused them to turn around and head for the rear. But his soldiers were exhausted from the extended campaigns and the numerous hardships they had endured. Then how can you blame us. The Macedonians marched swiftly along the Cophen River. Generally historians (mostly western) have put forward the thesis that Alexander defeated Porus and then as a mark of magnanimity gifted vast lands to Porus. Alexander deployed his infantry phalanxes in the center with a protective screen of mounted archers and light cavalrymen in front of them. As a result, Indian military units, most of which were archers, had participated in the Persian campaigns against Greece. We cant just put a conclusion. If Alexander had really lost the battle, then the tens of thousands of people who survived the battle would have all known that he was lying when he claimed victory over Porus. Alex didnt realise that too. So my dear friend, if you think Alexander conquered the entire earth and became the king of the world, you and your western historians can say it. Is it plausible to believe Porus beat Alexander? - Quora by Angel . Did Alexander successfully defeat Porus/Paurava at the Battle of Hydaspes? So WHY would he give the Kingdom he won BACK to Puru? So what you say is logical could well be based upon incorrect premises. Battle of Hydaspes. There is a trend going out in India where the nationalists are trying to tell the world that their ancient ancestors had knowledge of everything.. You wont know, when you will go to lords path. Quaero Sophisma: Alexander the Defeated - Blogger Everyone would know that anyone on war foot would never stop at one place for more that couple of weeks, that too if there is a reason. Porus did not rule India. On: July 7, 2022 Asked by: Leone Murphy Advertisement The battle resulted in a Greek victory and the surrender of Porus. Even the present time, Jhelum is around almost 800-1km wide. They resolved to use catapults and archers in battle and to capture enemy strongpoints by siege even though they knew that this would be a time-consuming process. AnswerNo. People generally only tend to acknowledge their enemies courage after they have been defeated. Taxila was an important ally both because of its location adjacent to India and because it had a large population that could furnish a substantial number of allied troops. For secondary weapons the Pauravan warriors of Alexanders time used swords, maces, and clubs. Even if we leave aside how incredibly implausible this whole idea that Alexander somehow managed to pass off a total defeat as a total victory is, there is still another problem, which is that, quite frankly, the story as we have it does not exactly make the best pro-Alexander propaganda and it is not the kind of story we would expect Alexander to have made up if he were going to make a story up. The western accounts of the battles state that Alexander the Great won against Porus' armies, and then, once Porus amounted a larger one, a great deal of the Greek forces mutinied, and then Alexander the Great retired his conquest and returned to Babylonia. Calling someone Nationalist, leftist, rightist whatever ist. The same feelings of fear and terror also were present within the army of King Porus of Paurava. Though Roman historians say it was porus who shot arrow at Alex. Youd agree by all the cited accounts it appears a very pyrrhic victory for Alexander. Alexander ordered his archers, light infantry, and light cavalry to counterattack. Maam, This link from wikipedia says that "After victory, Alexander made an alliance with Porus and appointed him as satrap of his own kingdom". So the chances are higher that there was a truce or very very pyrrhic victory. To deceive his opponent, Alexander built numerous campfires along his side of the river, marching his men back and forth in formation; meanwhile, his scouts searched for the best possible crossing spot. Ambhi chose not to fight Alex or say surrendered because Taxila university was priority for him too. Alexander was referred to as "great" by early historians just as several other conquerors and prominent rulers have been called across empires and ages.

Uc Berkeley Move Out Day 2023, Dunwoody Senior Baseball Schedule, Articles A

%d bloggers like this: